Page 1 of 7

J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 2:28 pm
by Auli
So... she was recently on a Twitter-rant about Trump not paying attention to a kid in a wheelchair! THAT MONSTTERR!

Her Twitter-rant: about:


but oops

Life comes at you fast:

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 2:44 pm
by Seele
She's another typical libshit sperger ultra feministo celeb with way too much time on her hands, using her celeb status to make her voice heard to get everyone to agree with her.

Her legacy is overpraised shit anyway.

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 3:17 pm
by Kugelfisch
Bitch has done nothing but sperg about femcunt shit for the last couple of years and nobody wanted any part of her crap beyond Harry Potter. She also lives in a fuckhueg mansion but expects everyone else to take rapefugees in their cramped homes. Typical UK libshit. All words, no action.

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 4:18 pm
by Keith Chegwin
You have no idea how much I hate the goddamn Harry Potter

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 4:56 pm
by rabidtictac
She's worthless. Her entire output is shit. The best thing about her is she entertains kids and gives them a reason to read books. The same could be said of any children's author.

Like most shitlibs, she thinks her opinions on subjects unrelated to her field are some big deal and worthy of attention. People giving her that attention only validates her delusion. JK Rowling's opinions on polidicks are worth exactly as much as a guest shitpost here on DHI.

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 5:35 pm
by VoiceOfReasonPast
Not to mention how she sometimes retcons her books to be more progressive (aka "Dumbledore was totally gay, guize!")

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:17 pm
by Keith Chegwin
rabidtictac wrote:
Sat Jul 29, 2017 4:56 pm
The best thing about her is she entertains kids and gives them a reason to read books. The same could be said of any children's author.
She doesn't though. Not really. This the thing I really hate about people who are all like 'OMG Harry Potter'. For most of them it's clearly the only book(s) they've ever read.

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 6:49 pm
by rabidtictac
I just remember being in school and my teacher for one of the grades would read us harry potter. I never read any of the books on my own or gave a shit about them, but there might have been some kid who was encouraged by that.

What made me want to read as a kid were stories about robin hood and star wars novels. I was a bookworm from that moment on.

I mean, reading does have some value and should be taught to kids. I don't want to totally discount the value of that, even though JK's work has no value APART from that.

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 9:50 pm
by Charlar
I developed a love for reading at 5-6 years old and remember only that it was an image book with a kid and giant mushrooms that started it all.
Yeah JK's work's is terrible but at least it wasn't as bad as the Sword of Truth series

Re: J. to the K. Rowling

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:18 pm
by VoiceOfReasonPast
I used to be really into kids horror stuff like the R. L. Stine books. Had a bit of a Harry Potter phase as well, but shortly before, after or during that I discovered Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams. I think I've never read something fast than the first Hitchhicker's Guide to the Galaxy.

Oh, also Stephen King when I was getting too old for Stine. I kinda prefer the good movie adaptations of his books though, as the books themselves are a bit dry and sometimes a bit effed up.