A very insightful summary.Liar Revealed wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2017 11:44 pmCertified Fresh on RT.
Fuck the internet. It's scary how right the Unabomber was about a lot of things.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczy ... Its_Future
So Muslims, basically.... the task of those who oppose industrial society is to promote "social stress and instability," and to propagate "an ideology that opposes technology," one that offers the "counter-ideal" of nature "in order to gain enthusiastic support." Thus, when industrial society is sufficiently unstable, "a revolution against technology may be possible."
A point that has been often raised on DHI by Poonoo, and one which is very true.He also criticizes conservatives, describing them as "fools" who "whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values."
Marx had many accurate criticisms of capitalism. But, of course, his proposed solutions were retarded and didn't work. And never will. I see the Unabomber the same way. This retard thought forcing a manifesto to be printed under threat of bombing would stop the march of technology? Lel. What an idiot.
Imagine the kind of force (because force is required for change) necessary to completely turn around our current economic, social and technological systems. To undo everything and revert people to "wild nature" or whatever he thought he'd be getting. Kek. Inevitable doesn't even begin to describe the march of technology.