Re: Capeshit thread (comics and movies)
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 2:16 pm
No. To Phil, the whole world is against him and nothing is ever his fault. Marxists are well aware of themselves being at fault and love it.
RIP to the only man that was as sick as Spoony claimed to be...
http://forum2.deadhorseinterchange.net/
http://forum2.deadhorseinterchange.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33
The goal is to make everyone equal, multiple attempts showed that it is impossible to make everyone equally happy and successful, because many times the happiness of one person is achieved by the misery of another, so the only way you can make people equally happy is to make them equally miserable, you have to drag the whole society to the level of the most miserable person, without any options to advance from that state and the result will be a society without misery, if everyone will be at the same level the concept of misery of happiness will cease to exist. That's the theory at least, implementing is impossible and dumb, but hey equality and shit. You can apply this reasoning to everything and it will more or less work: the so called wage gap? Just put a tax on to men so the income inequality ceases, if everyone has less then everyone has the same; rich people should pay some ridiculously big taxes like the 100% tax one of The candidates for the French president election had in his campaign so they could be equally as poor as everyone else because the amount of wealth they introduce to the market is irrelevant , wealth is just a social concept created by some white people in the XVIII century to oppress fellow human beings; You could probably even extend this to fully social issues if you would try.Poonoo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:23 pmNo, Marxists are miserable, shit people who feel the need to project their misery onto everyone else. Seeing someone else happy drives them insane, so they want ugliness everywhere so everyone is as hate filled as they are. Also Marxists are envious as fuck about everything, no one is allowed to be above them in any way, money, success, looks, talent, whatever it is they engage in the politics of envy.
100 percent taxe rate? Was that proposed by a socialist or a communist?sigh wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2017 7:01 amThe goal is to make everyone equal, multiple attempts showed that it is impossible to make everyone equally happy and successful, because many times the happiness of one person is achieved by the misery of another, so the only way you can make people equally happy is to make them equally miserable, you have to drag the whole society to the level of the most miserable person, without any options to advance from that state and the result will be a society without misery, if everyone will be at the same level the concept of misery of happiness will cease to exist. That's the theory at least, implementing is impossible and dumb, but hey equality and shit. You can apply this reasoning to everything and it will more or less work: the so called wage gap? Just put a tax on to men so the income inequality ceases, if everyone has less then everyone has the same; rich people should pay some ridiculously big taxes like the 100% tax one of The candidates for the French president election had in his campaign so they could be equally as poor as everyone else because the amount of wealth they introduce to the market is irrelevant , wealth is just a social concept created by some white people in the XVIII century to oppress fellow human beings; You could probably even extend this to fully social issues if you would try.Poonoo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:23 pmNo, Marxists are miserable, shit people who feel the need to project their misery onto everyone else. Seeing someone else happy drives them insane, so they want ugliness everywhere so everyone is as hate filled as they are. Also Marxists are envious as fuck about everything, no one is allowed to be above them in any way, money, success, looks, talent, whatever it is they engage in the politics of envy.
The bracelets are magic and made by Hephaestus, in some things they not only bounce bullets but they act as a limitor to her powers, it's like how Superman pulls his punches unless the target can survive his full strength or he wants to kill, yes Wonder Woman needs to have something to do something that Superman does on instincts because she's often a bit too willing to kill and she loves to go for the neckVoiceOfReasonPast wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:31 pmAnd people still believe it can work.
Anyhow, watched Wonder Woman today. Basically a more serious Captain America with tits. A step up from previous DC flicks, but has some lengths.
This "I wept tears of feminism at seeing jiggling tighs" dispshit is a real weirdo. What the hell was he focusing on that he even noticed?
And are her bracelets like magical? Or does she just need bracelets to channel her spontaneous DBZ powers? That felt like an odd thing to not explain at all.
Also, why does Hollywood keep turning antagonistic Greek gods into Not-Lucifer?
I don't know how this is presented in the comics, but in the movie they pretty much used the Judeo-Christian version of the story with greek god names, they even omit Prometheus [To be honest It can just be a more or less subconscious usage of an well established archetype] , but It was written (at least in part) by Snyder so I probably shoudn't try so hard to justify that.VoiceOfReasonPast wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:31 pmAlso, why does Hollywood keep turning antagonistic Greek gods into Not-Lucifer?
That makes sense, but the movie didn't really explain it, and it's hard to see where her own powerset ends and her bracelet's begins.Charlar wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2017 8:47 pmThe bracelets are magic and made by Hephaestus, in some things they not only bounce bullets but they act as a limitor to her powers, it's like how Superman pulls his punches unless the target can survive his full strength or he wants to kill, yes Wonder Woman needs to have something to do something that Superman does on instincts because she's often a bit too willing to kill and she loves to go for the neck