Feminism and SJW's in general

[rabidtictac]

I fixed your post because the spoiler tags fucked it. So I swapped to quote tags. Hope that's ok.

[Charlar]

Communism: Not Even Once.

All the good examples given by shitlibs of communist societies have collapsed.

When are you actually going to provide an argument other than posting memes about how communism happened and failed, or something about Tumblr feminism which has nothing to do with Communism and hasn't been relevant since 14' gamergate? Pol Pot actually wasn't a Communist (calling yourself Communist doesn't mean you're actually a Communist if you do nothing even remotely political... same would go if you called yourself a Nazi and married a Jew), Venezuala isn't Socialist just because they nationalized the industry - - - the government owns the industry, not the citizens. Nationalization via government isn't Communism or Socialism. No one argues that Venezuala is good. If they do, then they truly are uninformed. Finally, the reason why people say Communism hasn't been tried, is because it hasn't. Communism (AKA Full Communism, hence the gay subreddit Full Communism), and Anarchism are synonymous. Communist wants to achieve Full Communism through Socialism. An Anarchist wants to achieve Communism (or Full Communism, or Anarchy) by skipping the Socialist state idea and going straight to it. The reason why you see so many people argue today about how Communism should be brought today is because Lenin fucked things up with the idea of a vanguard party which was supposed to lead the Socialist state into Communism. In laymen's terms this essentially meant having a group of supposedly dedicated Communists that would never betray the cause usher the Russians into Full Communism. What happened is Lenin died, Stalin was now at the head of the Vanguard, and then in essence told everyone to eat his cock and became a dictator. Communists of today generally (90% I'd say) don't like this idea of a vanguard party. That's why they shit on Stalin and Lenin and say it wasn't tried properly. As for the Cheka, they slaughtered a shitload of the ruling class and white guard, along with their families. I'm not sure what you would expect from a group of angry ex farmers that had been living under a literal Tsar in 1917 to do. Stalin was a dictator and killed his political opponents. This would be the same thing as Operation Hummingbird or various other purges committed by Hitler. I know I sperged out but I can't take the memes anymore.

That wall of text wasn't typed by me, it's something I got from an Anarcho-Communist faggot after mocking Communism relentlessly. I just wanted an excuse to use that message, since it cracks me up every time I read it.

Also, I think it was mentioned already, but the spoiler tags aren't working properly.

>Anarcho-Communist
Aren't those mutually exclusive? I meant in the sense that every Communist countries inevitably become or start as totalitarian

[Pen Pal]

I fixed your post because the spoiler tags fucked it. So I swapped to quote tags. Hope that's ok.

It's fine. I edited it just before you did, and the spoiler tags weren't replaced by then. I'll just leave the post the way it is for now.

[Kugelfisch]

That could become a dank copypasta. It's sufficiently retarded. Also, relevant webbum:

phpBB [video]

[Poonoo]

That wall of text wasn't typed by me, it's something I got from an Anarcho-Communist faggot after mocking Communism relentlessly. I just wanted an excuse to use that message, since it cracks me up every time I read it.

You scared me for a minute dude. The amount of retardation in that post is astounding, especially this:

Nationalization via government isn't Communism or Socialism.

Maybe not Communisim in theory since it is essentially optimistic anarchy where everyone will totally get along with no rules or money and nothing bad would happen (the actual theory is retarded, Marx thought this would totally happen because humans would somehow evolve to not be competitive and become nice angels).

But Socialism? Nationalization via government is exactly what Socialism is. These dishonest cunts redefine words all the fucking time to suit their argument, they call the Nordic countries "socialist" so they can claim their system works. They ignore that what they propose is closer to Venezuela since in the Nordic countries they have a shit ton of business freedom and lower corporate tax rates (but high income tax and other taxes) and no legally mandated minimum wage.

[da PAC Nigguh]

the government owns the industry, not the citizens

Oh so the "citizens" will control the means of production with no government in place to manage anything.

How does that work? It doesn't, of course, since "Anarcho-Communism" is just a stupid internet meme just like "Gift Economy."

[Guest]

If that's not a pasta then all I can say is that Lenin and friends actually gunned down anarcho communists when they rose to power because as you already know through history they wanted to rule alone. The other thing is Lenin wasn't the one who introduced what everyone today knows as state planned economy, that was Stalin.

>Anarcho-Communist
Aren't those mutually exclusive? I meant in the sense that every Communist countries inevitably become or start as totalitarian

That's probably because they take control of the state and nationalise everything while not keeping a system in check that prevents someone to become dictator

[VoiceOfReasonPast]

"Full Communism" will never happen because it will ultimately boil down to a group with absolute power just giving up on that power, and then hoping that everyone will always play along.

Your anarcho-friend's only hope are AI overlords.

[veris leta facies]

[sigh]

furthermore white girls shouldn't even take part in halloween festivities at all, because their mere presence offends PoC.
You can not win no matter what.