Page 3 of 6

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:48 pm
by Poonoo
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:18 pm
Monty did nothing wrong.
He also did nothing right.

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:29 pm
by Kugelfisch
What DID he even do in the first place?

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:05 pm
by rabidtictac
There are too many good joke responses to that question, Kugel.

But what does any admin do? Mostly he bitched about how DHI was a sperge zone and not Cracked. :D

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:15 pm
by Kugelfisch
He certainly didn't help with the crap he made for the site.

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:49 pm
by Poonoo
rabidtictac wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:05 pm
There are too many good joke responses to that question, Kugel.

But what does any admin do? Mostly he bitched about how DHI was a sperge zone and not Cracked. :D


This video is mostly Templar reading out one of Monty's sperg posts about how we don't talk about his content when he temporarily banned TGWTG talk, with some potshots at him in there for good measure. I made that picture by the way.

But yeah, he tried to implement tight assed rules on a forum with about 10-20 people posting, that he marketed as a free speech zone. He was somehow surprised that attracting people who like free speech would be pissed at him implementing retarded rules like needed to make a minimum character amount for a post.

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:57 am
by Kugelfisch
Oh god, I remember shit like that. "We already talked about that!" bullshit everywhere. The notion that DHI should be about the DHI content producers who don't do shit for months on end was hilarious.

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:56 am
by rabidtictac
Even if people posted new "quality content" every single day, nothing posted to DHI could be as interesting as sperging about internet nobodies.

Now if the quality kahntent was ABOUT internet nobody sperge, maybe it could have worked.

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 3:24 am
by Kugelfisch
It's funny the site even held it's own for as long as it did. UT uploaded three or so videos in total and Ebeeto wasn't much better.

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:28 am
by VoiceOfReasonPast
Kugelfisch wrote:
Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:57 am
Oh god, I remember shit like that. "We already talked about that!" bullshit everywhere. The notion that DHI should be about the DHI kahntent producers who don't do shit for months on end was hilarious.
Of course! We gotta make our own bullshit instead of Fair-Using someone else's :lol:

Re: INDB 2.0?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 3:18 pm
by Kugelfisch
He who creates the content controlls the forum.